For example, the female form of fallen has fallen; The plural form of gone went. As you may expect, we will not add any more -s if the past party already ends in -s. Thus, the past participant to sit (to sit) remains seated in the male plural (although it becomes in the female and plural singular in Assisi or sitting). In these sentences, sentences of fifteen days and 60 kilos are not considered direct objects. In the first case, a fortnight is clearly not “the thing that is better”, and the 60 kilos is not “the thing that is weighed”. In these cases, therefore, the current participant does not agree. The most common reflexive verb, in which the past participant could change its pronunciation, is to sit > it sits. In most other common reflexive verbs, the past participant ends in a vowel. For example, in her dress, the extra-e does not change the pronunciation. In general, the current participant does not agree with the use of having.
In the following sentence, the subject is z.B. the female plural and the direct object (gifts) is plural male, but no correspondence is added to the previous purchased participle: the pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. So to know if current participants need to agree, you need to determine the function of the reflexive prognosis. That`s how it works. To summarize the lesson on the concordance of past participation, we can say that: – There is an absence between the former participatory and the direct object when the direct object is in front of the verb. However, if the direct object passes before the past participates, the past participant actually corresponds to that direct object. For example: (5) The reflexive pronoun may be a direct or indirect object of the verb used. Answer to Nhan: Regal is a transitive, as you regale, if someone (someone) is the direct object, and if you say “enjoy” “s” is the direct object, so “we are regaled your`on, there is a direct object that is “we” in front of the verb I understand that it is not easy, but not to worry, many French do not even remember this rule.
For the first group verbs, there is no difference between Washed and Washed when pronounced. All pronoun verbs are “tre verbs” in composite times and moods like the compound past, which means that previous entries must correspond to their subjects – at least in theory. In fact, it`s not that simple. There are other cases where the non-reflexive verb never accepts a direct object, but it is clearer that, in the reflexive form, the reflexive pronoun is the indirect object (and therefore does not correspond to the old participatory).